Roger Ebert's critiques of popular 90s films showcase his high standards for storytelling and character development. Here’s a look at some of the films he harshly reviewed.

Roger Ebert, a Pulitzer Prize-winning critic, had a distinct and often critical view of various films released in the 1990s. While mainstream audiences found many of these films entertaining, Ebert's reviews highlighted his concerns about storytelling, character depth, and artistic merit. This article explores seven notable films he critiqued and examines the reasoning behind his views.
In Hocus Pocus, which portrays a young boy who accidentally resurrects three witches, Ebert described the film as a “confusing cauldron” that lacked substantial character depth despite its cult classic status. His commentary reflects a critical view of how nostalgia can overshadow storytelling quality, challenging the idea that mere audience sentiment is enough to justify a film's success.
Armageddon, a box office success directed by Michael Bay, drew sharp criticism from Ebert, who labeled it “an assault on the eyes, the ears, the brain,” primarily due to its chaotic narrative and lack of depth. This critique sheds light on Ebert's belief that the emphasis on spectacle can detract from the essence of cohesive storytelling.
Ebert approached The Waterboy—a comedy starring Adam Sandler—with high hopes but ultimately found the humor lacking. While the film gained popularity, Ebert's disappointment speaks to his desire for complexity even in comedic narratives, raising the question of whether humor can succeed if it doesn’t resonate universally.
Fight Club, directed by David Fincher, sparked conversation about masculinity and identity, but Ebert referred to it as “macho porn” and critiqued its ambiguity. His observations indicate a preference for narratives with clearer moral frameworks, which may diverge from popular interpretations that celebrate the film's philosophical undertones.
Ebert's review of The Usual Suspects revealed his frustration with its intricate narrative structure. He believed the film was “confusing to the degree that I do understand, I don't care,” signaling a need for more straightforward storytelling that resonates with audiences rather than obfuscation for artistic sake.
Despite describing Batman & Robin as visually appealing, Ebert pointed out the lack of a genuine emotional core. His view that style cannot compensate for substance reflects his insistence on meaningful story arcs, a sentiment echoed by many critics who consider the film to be one of the weaker entries in the superhero genre.
Ebert famously gave North a rare zero-star rating, expressing visceral disdain for its artificiality and contrived plot. His intense reaction underscored his belief that films should resonate on a deeper level, setting high standards for cinematic storytelling.
Ebert’s critiques of 90s films compel us to examine the relationship between entertainment and artistry. His high standards remind audiences of the importance of credible storytelling and character development in cinema. While many films from the decade may have been commercially successful, Ebert's perspective challenges viewers to reflect on the balance between commercial viability and meaningful narratives.
For further reading, explore related movie analyses like 4 Movies from 2008 Showcasing Hollywood's Creative Peak and Exploring the Dangers of Failure in Film Adaptations of Beloved Series. Ebert's enduring influence continues to guide discussions on film critique and appreciation.
Movie explanation
EpisodeBreakdown may use automated tools to assist research, drafting, and formatting. Published pages are governed by our editorial and corrections policies, and source links are shown when they are available in the article record.
Discovery source: MovieWeb. The source identifies where the topic was discovered; EpisodeBreakdown is responsible for the commentary published on this page.
Reader response
Reactions and poll results are based on real reader responses. No account is required.
Ehsan Khoshbakht curates a retrospective reflecting on Hollywood's politically charged past at the Locarno Film Festival, emphasizing the relevance today.