California AG Rob Bonta responds to Paramount's threat to relocate, discussing the ongoing antitrust case involving the studio's merger plans during The Atlantic Festival.
On September 17, 2026, California Attorney General Rob Bonta spoke publicly about Paramount's potential relocation from California during a panel at The Atlantic Festival held at the Perelman Performing Arts Center in Manhattan. Bonta's comments are particularly relevant as they coincide with a significant antitrust lawsuit aimed at blocking Paramount's $111 billion merger with Warner Bros. Discovery.
Bonta emphasized that Paramount's threat to leave California has been a longstanding issue amid ongoing negotiations. He stated decisively, “They own it. It lies at their feet,” underscoring that the decision to relocate lies solely with the studio. Bonta reiterated that he cannot influence a company’s choice regarding its operational base, especially one that claims to be committed to Hollywood and California.
During the panel, Bonta noted that the effort from multiple states, including Texas and Tennessee, to attract Paramount reveals the pressures surrounding the situation. However, the heart of his statement focused on the importance of the antitrust suit itself, characterizing it as straightforward and describing it as a "black-and-white, bread-and-butter, meat-and-potatoes antitrust case."
In addition to addressing the threat of relocation, Bonta discussed the current status of negotiations surrounding the antitrust suit. Although a settlement conference is scheduled for next month, he acknowledged that both parties are engaged in discussions regarding a resolution. Bonta expressed his openness to reaching a settlement that serves California's interests.
He was clear that, while they are open to negotiations, any agreement must yield favorable outcomes for the state. “We will do our job. We have a job to enforce the law without fear, without favor,” he assured during his remarks. His readiness to engage in good faith negotiations within the framework of the law suggests a balancing act between legal obligations and operational realities faced by Paramount.
Highlighting the larger context, Bonta described Texas and Tennessee's courting of Paramount as somewhat disingenuous, questioning the integrity of their efforts. Moreover, he criticized a strategy to secure a nearly $1.9 billion bond related to the antitrust suit, asserting it as an attempt to exert unwarranted pressure on the case. Since the issue has garnered significant media attention, the implications may extend beyond Paramount, potentially affecting California's entertainment industry at large.
This litigation gains further significance as the Trump Administration's Department of Justice sides with Paramount, adding another layer of complexity to the case that could influence the proceedings.
As developments unfold, the coming weeks will be pivotal—both regarding the approach of Paramount and how the legal system handles the complexities of this high-stakes antitrust battle. Stay tuned to EpisodeBreakdown for ongoing updates regarding these critical negotiations and their potential impact on California's entertainment landscape.
For more on related subjects, check out Texas Courts David Ellison as Paramount Considers Relocation and Law & Crime Expands Representation with WME Partnership.
Entertainment news
EpisodeBreakdown may use automated tools to assist research, drafting, and formatting. Published pages are governed by our editorial and corrections policies, and source links are shown when they are available in the article record.
Discovery source: The Hollywood Reporter. The source identifies where the topic was discovered; EpisodeBreakdown is responsible for the commentary published on this page.
Reader response
Reactions and poll results are based on real reader responses. No account is required.
